1. I had a lot of quotes, citations, etc. But I like the way I used numbers and bullets to correspond things to other related things (makes sense when you read it I promise). Even though it's not a blog post or QRG, I think it makes the paper more readable.
2. The production went well if not long and meticulous. The one concern I have is sharing about my experiences with a sociopath- I did it to establish ethos and pathos, but I'm afraid it's coming off as sort of a sob story which is definitely not my intention. I just want to say that I can recognize this behavior and draw parallels from real life sociopaths to Trump. Is this unprofessional or effective? Thoughts on that would be helpful af.
My Outline Goal
- Paragraph 2: Building on that, the cute thing about people with Antisocial Personality Disorder is that they are never what people think they are.
- List sociopathic tendencies
- List psychopathic tendencies
- List reasons I think he's a pathological liar
- List narcissistic tendencies
- Establish my credibility as someone whose deal with someone with this personality disorder and whose entire life was almost entirely demolished as a result so imagine what that same person with all the power could do to our country... but it's no big deal.
What it actually became
I think I did a solid job organizing this, but it's long as hell so instead of copy pasting it, have a nice link to a google doc.
The formatting is a tad different because I copy pasted it from a word doc, but the weird stuff at the very end is just notes that I left myself for revision.
Here is my review:
ReplyDeletehttp://barnettben.blogspot.com/2016/04/peer-review-11a.html
Good luck on the rest of the project!